What is a key benefit of enforcing an aggressive signal leakage policy?

Enforcing an aggressive signal leakage policy is primarily aimed at reducing the amount of ingress interference that can degrade service quality. When a company actively monitors and addresses signal leakage, it minimizes the potential for external signals to intrude into the system, which can lead to serious performance issues. This proactive approach significantly decreases the number of ingress-related service calls since less interference translates to a more stable and reliable service for customers.

By lowering ingress-related problems, technicians spend less time addressing complaints associated with signal degradation or system malfunctions caused by outside interference. This creates a more efficient environment for both service providers and customers, as issues are resolved before they escalate into service disruptions, leading to an overall improvement in service reliability.

The other options do not reflect the primary advantage of an aggressive signal leakage policy. For instance, while customer satisfaction may improve as a result of reduced interference, it is a more indirect benefit rather than a direct result of reducing ingress-related service calls. Higher equipment costs could also be an undesirable consequence of implementing such a policy, as significant investments may be needed for monitoring and repairs. Lastly, an increased number of service calls does not align with the intended outcome of effectively managing signal leakage.